Well Done
In the front end you make all these promises, but in the back end you pile money up to the sky.
Well done!
You've done a wonderful job of tearing down the country into pieces.
Well done!
You've done a splendid job of selling out the country with your business plan.
Well done!
Kanilai Farms, Kanilai Cosmetics, Kanilai Mburu, Kanilai Transportation, Kanilai Dem Macca, Kanilai Tobaski, etc.
Well done!
Strictly personal gains you've pursued all these years. And now tax rates are higher that the plane you fly in.
Well done!
Meeting peaceful protesters at the gate with arrest,
torture and death. And now Solo Sandeng is MIA and Lawyer Darboe changed.
Well done!
You deserve a round of applause for all your hard work that has left the country in ruins and in a perpetual state of darkness.
Well done!
Now who's going to deal with the IMF? For your services, I must congratulate and salute you!
Well done!
I write commentary on a range of issues affecting my community and society at large. My main objective is to help push the conversation to the next level, especially, in the Gambian community.
Sunday, April 24, 2016
Friday, April 8, 2016
Deffanteh Republic
Jammeh's first defanteh was in 1994 after accidentally taking over. He arrested ministers and other high government officials and loaded them in lorries, confiscated their properties, and jailed/tortured some. Called them RATS and accused them of embezzlement and storing the loot in their homes in Pipeline.
Next deffanteh session was with the British. Jammeh accused them of ruling Gambia for 400 years and stealing our elephants, zebras, buffalos, lions, giraffes, hippos, cobras, rattlesnakes and ningkinankas. I guess they left the crocodiles because we have them plenty, and Jammeh now owns most of them, but all others mentioned are now extinct.
The 2012 deffanteh with the opposition was a good one too. Jammeh call them dogs and said he will not bark back at them. In that deffanteh, Jammeh said “Is it now that I am using government resources? If they [opposition] think that the resources I am using are government resources, what do they mean by government resources? You know they are never specific? They are here to serve foreign interest and I don’t care." Then who’s resources are they and what foreign interest are they (opposition) serving? Be specific please! Jammeh also let the opposition know that if he takes back what he owns at the state institutions, they will not function. Even the state broadcaster, GRTS, he claimed, is using his cameras and that The Gambia Government last purchased a vehicle for him in 1995. And, since then, he has been designing the type of vehicles he wants and they (manufacturers) do it the way he wants them. Borom Gambia Y!
How about the deffanteh with the domas (witches)? That one was weird! Rounded up some domas and gave them a cocktail mix to drink and spill the beans. How many were rounded up again and where are they now? And who ratted out the domas?
Then there is the ongoing deffanteh with Senegal. How many times have the border been closed sah? Who’s counting? But my favorite Senegal deffanteh was last November's, in which Jammeh insulted the Senegalese leaders. He said President Abdou Joof lost because he didn't listen to his advice. He accused President Wade of discussing him (Jammeh) with the whites, and he attributed Senegal’s problems to Mr. Wade’s “ndel fondong” (bald head). He even threatened to “nan” NescafĂ© on Mr. Wade’s “ndel fondong” too. Classic! And he called President Macky Sall a puppet. Deffanteh 101 right there!
Given this backdrop, I have some deffenteh suggestions: How about deffanteh with the economy and show it who’s boss? How about deffanteh with the crumbling roads? They need someone to set them straight. The electricity supply has been playing games for so long and needs to be wrestled down. Unemployment is pushing the youths into the Atlantic Ocean and needs some serious defanteh. The Banjul gutters have been stubbornly stagnant for God knows how long; who’s going to defanteh with them? So far, the Banjul Mosquitos are winning their deffanteh! This is just a tip of the “deffanteh iceberg”. Let the real “deffanteh games” begin!
Sunday, March 27, 2016
Happiness and Fulfillment
If you ask people about "happiness
and fulfillment" and what it means to them, you will probably get a
variety of answers. The general approach to happiness is
that if you attain what you desire, you are happy; and if you don't, you are
unhappy. Win the lottery, get a great job, get married, go on a holiday, and
you are happy. Miss the lottery, don't get a great job, don't get married, don't
go on a holiday, and you are miserable. Or is often considered as a subjective
state of mind, as when one claims one is happy when one is at a beach enjoying
a cool drink on a hot day, or is out “having fun” with friends.
Webster
defined happiness as "the emotion evoked by success or by the prospect of
possessing what one desires." But this may sound shallow to a reflective
person because they know that this kind of happiness is fleeting. Here one
minute and gone the next! When the "having fun" is over or we finally
possess what we have been desiring, somehow the happiness soon fades, and
before we know it we are back to our disgruntled self again, desiring something
new to make us temporarily happy again. However, more often than not, happiness
remains forever elusive for those with such shallow views.
But
if you go beyond the surface, the understanding of "happiness and
fulfillment" drastically changes. Plato argues that we must be moral
in order to be truly happy, and that it hinges on the four cardinal virtues: wisdom,
courage, moderation, and justice. Wisdom
is based on mind. Plato believes that the wise person uses the mind
to understand moral reality and then apply it to daily life. The wise person is
guided by prudence in the choices they make. Courage has to do with how we handle
adversity, but it also includes one's
convictions. As a matter of fact, Socrates, who was Plato's mentor, chose to
die rather than abandon his deepest convictions. Moderation (self-control) is connected to our desires. Human beings have endless
desires, and that's not necessarily a bad thing. But it becomes problematic
when we desire a good thing in the bad way, or a bad thing.
Our desires for
food, sex,
alcohol and material possessions must not consume our lives in a way that
compromises our character, but don't tell that to some people, they may accuse
you of being jealous. Justice
relates to one's overall character. For Plato, the just person has a healthy
soul, in which reason rules the appetites and our desire for honor. The just
person is fulfilled, at peace, and truly happy.
In my evolution, I've been inching
closer and closer towards Plato's view of "happiness and
fulfillment". Not there yet though because the gravitation is slow; the
road is full of obstacles and other forces are pulling from different
directions too. Growing up in a place where resources were limited (and still
are), I was made to believe, for the most part, that material success is what
defines and fulfills an individual. Your success is generally measured by the
amount of material possessions you accumulate, regardless of your character,
especially now. This idea of success has now led too many folks in my community
to abandoned morality and dignity and plunged into the ocean of injustice and
hypocrisy.
The "pretentious culture" in
my opinion is a source of misery for too many folks. They will lie, cheat and
steal just to impress others. It is simply hard to coexist with these types of
people if you’re more interested in simplicity and gratitude. Pretension is a
mask that allows you to be someone else, and many get consumed by it.
Ultimately it can make you and those around you very unhappy. Our relationships with others, while vital to
human existence, can often cause us a tremendous amount of anguish. On the same
token, our relationships profoundly influence, if not define many aspects of
our lives.
While there are "happiness and
fulfillment" prescriptions from thinkers and religion, it should still be
considered somewhat relative. What works for one may not work for another. But
as I continue my journey in life, I find myself rebelling against this notion
of material possession as the yard stick for happiness and success, and define
my own state of happiness. My quest for "happiness and fulfillment"
has led me down the part of seeking health (moral and physical), peace of mind,
and sound wisdom.
In pursuing these goals, I've been
able to make enormous strides in keeping my sanity, distance myself from
unnecessary contention, and avoid the rat race. Moreover, I focus on nurturing
who I am, rather than who I should be. I refuse to surrender to the unnatural demands
of the class struggle, my lucidity is too important. My objective is to live
simply, live well, and try to make a difference (no matter how little).
Overall, I'm in a place of contentment and it keeps getting better. We should
all learn to appreciate the simple things in life more, for they can bring you
the most happiness.
Sunday, January 17, 2016
Under My Umbrella
In our daily lives, we use several different objects that perform certain functions to make life easier. We use a vehicle to drive to places, a phone to make calls, and a pen to write. What happens when a phone stops performing the function of making calls? Should we still consider it a phone or something else? What happens when a vehicle is now sitting on blocks in the middle of your compound and kids are using it for driving simulation? Should we still consider it a vehicle or a toy for the kids?
It's been raining here and I've been using my umbrella to protect me from the rain. My umbrella performs the function of keeping me dry to a degree when the rain is pouring. When opened, the umbrella's metal spokes forms an anchor for the waterproof material attached to them to protect me from the rain. In sum, my umbrella performs the function of protecting me from the rain.
Generally, we all do. We may say that the umbrella is broken, but we will still call it an umbrella even though it's no longer performing the function of an umbrella. Granted it was once an umbrella, but it has now ceased to function as one. Then what is it now? It's definitely something.
When Jammeh came to power through a coup in 1994, he claimed to be this "huge umbrella" that can stretch from one end of the sky to the other; promised to protect Gambians from the "rains" of corruption, abuse of power, and everything else that the former government was doing wrong. He called them rats, arrested them, and confiscated their properties. He assured Gambians that he was the "Umbrella" for them and they will never be drenched by corruption again.
But when the storms came, Gambians found themselves drenched in blood from the torture and killings, shaking like a leaf from fear, and getting washed away into the Atlantic Ocean by the flood waters. As it turned out, that "huge umbrella" covering the sky from one end to the other, never had a waterproof material attached to the spokes. It has been just the handle and naked spokes all the while. How come the majority never took a second to look up?
Fast forward to now, that umbrella is being collapsed on Gambians and the spokes are violently poking their skulls. Every aspect of their lives is being altered on a daily basis. Day has become night and right has become wrong. God has become man and religion has become a tool. Fundamentally, things are in reverse order. But it is forbidden to talk about it or attempt to address the issues. A functional umbrella is the doctor's order, if Gambians want protection.
Wednesday, December 23, 2015
Black or White
Not a day goes by without hearing complaints from those residing in The Gambia about how desperate the situation is there. They lament about flying inflation, lack of employment and opportunity, harassment, intimidation, abuse, chronic corruption, fear, and all this is done through whispering because they think someone is listening. Sometimes they just sum it up as “Gambia easywut”. You hear these complaints from people from all walks of life. From high government officials, lawyers, doctors, artists, business owners, petty traders, fish sellers at the market, and of course, the unemployed. Basically, across the spectrum! I would not be surprised to hear that Jammeh himself has uttered “Gambia easywut” a few times!
Folks are looking for every opportunity to flee and will risk their lives in doing so. A back way travel package sells like hot cake, especially around Christmas. I guess they are trying to escape the arrival of the “Semesters” and their swagger? The “Swagger parties” are on and in full swing as we speak. Groups are chipping in £20 or $50 each and throwing parties daily, while those struggling to afford “tapalapa” are enviously watching and wishing it was them. Amid all this, they also hear a panoply of stories about different adventures in the west from the semesters. At least for a couple of weeks, a semester is the envy of those they left behind as some make promises, most of which will never be delivered. Is there glory in such? Is this success?
On one hand, semesters are flocking to the smiling coast while most in the smiling coast are frowning. They are buying up kabaa ndombo, ditah, solom solom, koni, gerrteh saaf, kobo bu laka, and all those other little things that are now almost a luxury for the locals; even Talapia (wass) has now become scarce and a semi-luxury item. Semesters are sponsoring Benechini Penda Mbye festivals, attaya sessions, pejeh shawarma, and throwing VIP swagger parties. On the other hand, too many locals are looking for a way out by any means necessary, and the back way numbers is a testament to that. Gambia ranks on the top in the region percentage wise in back travel. The Atlantic Ocean has swallowed too many Gambian youths and their promises and talents washed to shore as corpses hardened by rigamortis. Senegal has also become a cradle.
And the irony to me here is: While Gambians abroad flock for a life of temporary fantasy and party “semester style”, permanent residents are looking to escape their daily realities of crushing poverty, flying inflation, lack of employment and opportunity, harassment, intimidation, abuse, corruption and fear.
So this brings me to my question: Is Gambia black or white? Gray maybe? Howma sah!
Sunday, December 6, 2015
Battle Of The Sexes
![]() |
| Picture courtesy of http://chicorita.com |
Should men and women be treated differently? When rephrased, this question is actually asking if men and women are equal. This question is not new and has been grappled with by thinkers in the past, present, and I’m certain in the future as well. It is a very delicate and sensitive subject. The world has been dominated by men probably since time began, and is still dominated by men. But will it continue to be dominated by men? I guess time will tell.
However, let’s take a moment and go back in time to see how philosophers responded to this issue. The social status of women in ancient Greece was a very limited one to say the least. In an era where women were little better than domestic slaves, there were few supporters of any kind of equality for them. One of these rare supporters, surprisingly, was none other than the great philosopher Plato. This was unheard of in Greek society - or any other society for that matter. A woman in ancient Greece was typically always under the control or protection of a man. In the Republic, Plato argued that women (at least those in the upper classes) must be assigned social roles, in the ideal state, equal (or approximately) to those of men. Plato's position in the Republic is based upon his view that, "…women and men have the same nature in respect to the guardianship of the state.” First he compares the apparent weaknesses of women to men and how women (and men) each have individual strengths and talents. For this reason, the woman then has equally, with the man, the same qualities which makes a guardian. He suggested that the same education which makes a man a good guardian would make a woman a good guardian.
A generation later, Aristotle (Plato’s most famous disciple), had exactly the opposite view regarding women. He believed a man to be an inherently better leader than a woman - the male is by nature fitter for command than the female - and the male is by nature superior and the female inferior; to Aristotle, the male was a ruler and the female was merely a subject. Aristotle basically said that a woman should be obedient to the will of her husband/men. He took a rather strict view of gender roles even comparing the male/female relationship to that of a master and slave.
Fast forward to 2015, the debate about gender equality is still raging. While significant strides have been made since the days of Plato and Aristotle, the inequality between the sexes still persists. For the feminists and their supports, “equal” doesn’t mean “same” – it means that men and women should be given the same opportunities, such as being offered the same jobs, assuming the same skill level; offered the same pay amount, assuming the same quality of work; and given the same ability to live a life free of fear and sexual harassment. Although laws are on the books now to try to rectify some of the equalities between men and women in the work place, the rest of society has to also do its part in the social arena. Some things you just can’t legislate laws for, it will take a shift in societal attitudes. Our attitudes determine what we value and how we treat each other.
Despite being a product of a culture where women were and still are seen as less than men, my views on the issue have always been progressive. My take on the issue, from a very young age, has always aligned with that of Plato. Not that I was a young philosopher, or even remotely close to one, but I’ve always believed in basic fairness. Growing up in The Gambia, like much of the world, women were always in the back seat when it came to decision-making at almost all levels, but at the front seat of taking care of the household. Their duties weren’t official, but they were the hardest. Additionally, for a good number of women, they had to compete with a second, third or even a fourth wife in their marriages. Luckily for me, this was not the case in my immediate family, but it was the reality for some of my friends and neighbors. Even though this practice is sanctioned by the culture and I knew it, these inequalities still don’t sit well with me. To quote Aristotle "…the worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." But as clearly articulated by today’s feminists and their supports, “equal” doesn’t mean “same” – it means that men and women should be given the same opportunities, that's all. Wish someone told Aristotle that!
Now that I have two daughters of my own, I have become even more of a believer in the equal treatment of men and women, not just in the work place, but in society and in general. I see talent in my daughters that would rival any boy their age, and I hope with time my advocacy will intensify. I’m a strong believer that talent has no gender and should not be assigned one.
Saturday, December 5, 2015
My Peace
My Peace
You feed my soul and elevate my spirit
A permanent rainbow in my clouds that has no end
Your gentle ripples bring me endless tranquility
Your majestic waves carry me through the ups and downs
My Peace
With you my mind is sharp and my heart is receptive
You free me from contention and keep me gratified
You keep my heart dancing and my smile twinkling
Your presence motivates me and keeps me sane
My Peace
A safe and comforting space free from turbulence
Free from toxic vibes that pollute my mind and soul
My cocoon when the weather is inclement
For all these, I will forever cherish and treasure you
My Peace!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





