Monday, December 29, 2014

The United States’ Footprints in Latin America – A Trail of Horror

The Western Hemisphere School for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC) formerly known as the US Army School of the Americas (SOA) is a United States Department of Defense School located at Fort Benning in Columbus, Georgia, that provides military training to Latin American countries. The length of the United States global arm is not a secret, whether economically or militarily.


After World War II, there was a heightened military and economic tension mainly between the United States and Soviet Union. World War II left the Soviet Union and the United States as the two major super powers, but they had fundamentally different economic and political interests: Soviet Union being a single party – communist state and the United States a democratic capitalist state. The power struggles between the two super powers for world dominance never actually lead to direct wars between the two, instead, is was fought through various proxy wars in Korea, Afghanistan and Vietnam, which they both supported.

In their efforts to gain the upper hand and stop communism from spreading in Latin America during the cold war, the United States initially established the School of the Americas in Panama in 1946 to train Latin American soldiers in counterinsurgency techniques, sniper training, commando and psychological warfare, military intelligence and interrogation tactics, and the use of torture. It was originally named the Army Caribbean School and renamed The School of Americas in1963. But the school was expelled from Panama in 1984 under the terms of the Panama Canal Treaty. Panama’s former President, Jorge Illueca described the School of the Americas as the “biggest base for destabilization in Latin America.”

In 2000, in an attempt to improve its image, its name was changed to the Western Hemisphere School for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC).  Since its inception, more than 64,000 Latin American soldiers have been trained at the School of the Americas – among them, some of the regions’ most brutal human rights violators, such as Roberto D’Abuisson, the Salvadoran death-squad leader. A total of 11 Latin American dictators have attended courses at the School of the Americas; men such as Argentine junta leader, Leopoldo Galtieri and Guatemala’s Efraín Ríos Montt, campaign against indigenous villages were classified as “genocide” by a UN-sponsored commission.

The School of the Americas had a bad reputation through the years up until the end of the Cold War. In 1996, the school’s training manuals were declassified. According to a Pentagon memorandum, they promoted the use of intimidation, bounties to kill enemies, torture, false imprisonment, executions and the use of truth serum. Interrogation techniques and the term “neutralization”, which the department of defense admits is a euphemism for illegal execution, were also included in the manuals. The numbers of stories about graduates from the school of the Americas heading repressive regimes or actively committing human rights violations in Latin America are too abundant for it to be a coincidence. The atrocities linked to past graduates of SOA are too horrific and disturbing by any standards.

According to Dennis Dunleavy, on the morning of November 16, 1989, a company of elite Salvadoran soldiers entered the grounds of the University of Central America in San Salvador, El Salvador and dragged six Jesuit priests, their housekeeper and her daughter from their beds. Once taken outside the priests were then summarily executed. He further explained that 19 of the 26 soldiers implicated in the murders were graduates of the US Army’s School of the Americas in Fort Benning, Georgia. That’s an astounding 73 percent!

The execution of the Jesuit priests is just a tip of the iceberg. The long list of atrocities perpetrated by
graduates since the inception is jaw dropping. In Colombia, 120 out of 245 military officers connected with the worse human rights abuses were SOA graduates according to a 1992 investigation by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. That’s 49.98 percent! In 1981, in El Salvador the Salvadoran army in the small remote village of El Mozote murdered more than 1,000 farmers. 10 of the 12 officers connected to the murders were graduates from SOA. That’s 83.3 percent! Graduates from the SOA have consistently used their skills to wage war against their own people. They targeted educators, union organizers, religious workers, student leaders, and others who work for the rights of the poor. Hundreds of thousands of Latin Americans have been tortured, raped, assassinated, “disappeared,” massacred, and forced into refugee by those trained at the SOA (aka School of Assassins).

In my interview with Jose Angel Ramirez (not his real name), a 57 year-old Colombian veterinarian, former student union member, and a member of the Patriotic Union Party, revealed to me his experience and shared some of his intimate knowledge. According to Jose, the US backed Columbia military created paramilitary groups who did most of their dirty work for them. He claimed that they assassinated his party’s presidential candidate who was on the verge of winning the presidential elections, and killed a lot of very active members too. They killed around 3000 people and he was one of their targets as well, but he fled to the United States. Prior to escaping to the United States, he was taken from a library by men who he believed to be CIA agents, who wanted to pay him $1000 a month to become an informant for them against his own people.

As a child, Jose learned about how North America took Panama form Colombia and how 3000 workers for the United Fruit Company (a US company) were killed when they tried to organize. So he grew up with the feeling that the US was their enemy because they had their hand all over Latin America, and they trained soldiers at the School of the Americas who came back and committed human rights abuses on their people. When I asked him why he thought the Unites States got involved in Latin America, he replied, “for security and economic interest; their Security interest in terms of the Cold War, terrorism, and the war on drugs, and economic interest in terms of resources and military technology and arms sale”. But he believes United States gained neither, instead, they lost respect and left a trail of blood and horror. And now that most of the Latin America countries have distanced themselves from the United States, they (US) have shifted their interest to the Middle East in the name of security and economic interest. The United States is now partnering with Middle Eastern countries to train their soldiers in counterterrorism techniques.

There is ample evidence of the US training Latin American soldiers at the School of the Americas and their link to Human rights abuses there. There are numerous articles published on the School of the Americas Watch website as recent as June 2014 that makes the link. For the most part, the United States had full knowledge of the abuses and still supported them. Interviewed by reporter John Dinges for his book published in 2004, The Condor Years, Congressman Edward Koch (later mayor of New York City) said that George H. W. Bush, then CIA director, informed him in October 1976 that “his sponsorship of legislation to cut off U.S. military assistance to Uruguay on “human rights” grounds had provoked secret police officials to ‘put a contract out for you’. In mid-October 1976, Koch wrote to the Justice department asking for FBI protection, but none was provided. This lax attitude by the United States in turn created a form of structural political violence and generated a climate of impunity.

General Pinochet of Chile and his armed forces were aided and abetted by the United States in spite of their use of terror both at home and abroad. Virtually all the Chilean military officers who overthrew Allande had trained in a US military school before the coup; and most of those studied at the School of the Americas. Some of the most infamous acts of international terrorism committed by the Pinochet regime included the 1974 car bomb assassination of General Carlos Pratts and his wife in Buenos Aires; the 1974 attempted murder of Bernardo Leighton of the Chilean Christian Democratic Party in Rome; and the car bomb execution of Olando Letelier, former ambassador to the United States for Allende, and his aid in Washington DC. Orchestrated by the Chilean secret police and connected to Operation Condor, a network of South American intelligence agencies collaborated in hunting down and assassinated political dissidents who opposed dictatorships in their native countries. The fact that Pinochet’s secret police comfortably operated in the United States is a clear indication that CIA and FBI were most likely aware of its activities. A key case highlighting U.S. involvement in Operation Condor was that of Chilean Jorge Isaac Fuentes, who was captured by Paraguayan police in 1971 and was last seen savagely tortured. According to Patrice McSherry, in his article Operation Condor: Deciphering the U.S. Role, declassified U.S. documents include a letter from the U.S. Embassy in Buenos Aires (written by FBI officer Robert Scherrer) informing the Chilean military that Fuentes had been captured.

After the end of the Cold War, the United States’ focus shifted to the War on Drugs and they continued their training of soldiers from Latin America. Although the number of soldiers from Latin America coming to the US to train has declined in recent years, Columbia and Mexico still remain the top two countries the US is spending money on to train their soldiers to help fight the war on drugs. Colombia happens to be a huge producer of drugs and Mexico happens to be a big distributor of drugs into the United States because of its proximity. In 2013 Fiscal Year, the Department of Defense spent the most money on training soldiers from Columbia and Mexico, $26,226,017 and $11, 774, 423 respectively. For the United States in general and those at WHINSEC in particular, it is imperative for them to partner with nations in the Western Hemisphere to eliminate the drug problem in their own countries before it spreads into the United States. For them, WHINSEC and the training they provide in counter-drug operations and narco-terrorism is a critical tool. WHINSEC believes that the training it provides coupled with working together with Latin American nations will help make the US streets safer and have a positive impact on crime rates within participating nations. They have also vehemently denied that their teachings were ever directly linked to anyone committing a crime or a violation. According to retired US Army Colonel Gilberto R. Perez in his interview with Ledger Enquirer, WHINSEC is now continuously engaging with the public, with protesters, with the media, with NGOs related to human rights, and anyone who is interested in visiting the school. He further states that WHINSEC is open to visitors every working day and invites people to sit in class, talk with students and faculty, and review instructional material.

Despite WHISEC’s denial that their trainings were linked to any human rights violation, there is ample evidence showing otherwise. The United States involvement in Latin America has always been, and remains to be security and economics, but that approach has contradicted the very principles of freedom and democracy they promote. Many human rights violations have been committed directly or indirectly, in their pursuit of their economic and security interest.  Human rights groups and social movements are increasingly united in decrying the use of army troops and militarized police in repressing popular movements and defending corporations in their efforts to wrest resource-rich lands from communities. What the priority should be instead, is building strong, transparent judicial institutions to address human rights crimes and ensure accountability. To eradicate the evil of violent crime, investment is needed, not in military equipment or police and military training. The focus should be assisting in providing unbiased and sustainable economic development that addresses the basic needs of the poor. This, I believe, will result to a better security and economic gain for the United States.

Monday, October 20, 2014

Doctor WHO?

The Dr. Zakir Naik train is still not at its final destination so let’s keep riding.:-). There are some who believe that Dr. Zakir Naik should not be challenged because he’s an Islamic scholar and full of wisdom. Maybe it will be helpful to remind them than he is also a human being and vulnerable to all the temptations that we all struggle with daily. Anyone who attempts to spread something we believe not to be true should be challenged, Muslim or not, doctor or nurse.

Dr. Zakir said he never heard of Gambia prior to his invitation, but he was quick to declare Jammeh a good president and a good Muslim. How?  Based on what? Is he in the business of judging who is a good Muslim and who is not? You mean to tell me that this “fine Islamic scholar” didn't take the time to google Gambia? Not buying it! If Dr. Zakir can have an opinion about Jammeh to declare him a good president and a good Muslim without prior knowledge of him, then it’s totally fair for others to have an opinion about Dr. Zakir too, for making statements as a “scholar” without doing his homework.

Dr. Nakir Naik branded himself an Islamic scholar and a warehouse of religious knowledge and wisdom, and he sells himself as such. The promotional videos on his website are a testament to that. To me, a scholar of such caliber should be able compose himself/herself when faced with a simple challenge regarding what he preaches,  and be able to intelligently and confidently answer any questions or defend challenges pertaining to statements he made?

Well, not Dr. Zakir Naik! When he was challenged by a young Christian lady in the Gambia regarding a statement he made about Christianity, you could vividly notice that he was agitated and uncomfortable. To avoid having the conversation, he told the young lady that he does not debate women, accused her of having a sickness and needs to be cured, and that she does not understand English. In short, he ridiculed her to avoid having the conversation, and in the process, may have contributed in inciting the crowd to get hostile against the young lady. Then at the end, the young lady’s mic was cut off. I thought “scholars” were open minded? I am so proud of Christina Jatta!  In addition, the fact that he (Dr. Nakir) never at any point in his lectures in The Gambia addressed the issue of tyranny exposes him even further.  As a scholar, he should have known the waters he was swimming in.

And for a president of a nation to invite Dr. Nakir with all the expenses involved, just to ask questions like “should a Muslim man marry a woman who is not a virgin?” is just out of this world. President Jammeh could not have found out for himself or ask any of the Imams in The Gambia?  What is he walking around with a Quran for then? I though he mastered the Quran enough to used it in his curing sessions?  Not sure if this was the ultimate disrespect to all the Imams in The Gambia because Jammeh may have more in store for them, but it sure is up there.

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Pan-Africa for WHO? African Leaders, A No Show on Ebola

Pan-Africans say “Africa for Africans” and “we can take care of our own”. I have not seen the AU (African Union) in the vanguard of this Ebola fight anywhere neither have I seen any African leader taking the lead or attempting to lead the fight.

The UN General Assembly held a session in New York a couple of weeks ago, and the African leaders missed the opportunity to lay out their ‘Ebola plan of action’ there, when the whole world was listening. Was there a plan of action in the first place? I heard a lot of ranting about other issues there though.

Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe has been in the news lately bragging about being feared by the West, and talking about how other African leader are cowards and afraid to stand up to the West, but nothing about Ebola. I believe Ebola is a more pressing issue. Has Mugabe sent any doctors or nurses to help fight Ebola in Liberia or Sierra Leone? Instead, he’s contemplating recalling his soldiers that are part of the UN Peacekeeping Force in Liberia.

Paul Bayi of Cameroon and Yaya Jammeh of Gambia are subscribers to Pan-Africanism too, but have they sent any doctors or nurses to the Ebola affected areas to assist? Where is the sense of urgency for Los Pan-Africanos?  How come they are not using the media to talk about Ebola and their plans to contain or eradicate it?

I have seen others scrambling to send personnel and equipment to the affected areas, but nothing in the form of personnel and equipment from the Pan-Africans. Is Pan-Africanism just talk and no action? Africa for Africans and we can take care of our own?

With the help of the Bill and Malinda Gates Foundation, Malaria still kills over 500,000 a year in Africa. I recently read an article listing the 10 richest African leaders and the billions and millions they have accumulated. How much have they contributed towards malaria research? Ebola is collapsing the fragile health systems that exist in the affect countries, and the Pan-Africans are nowhere to be found.

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

Are you what you post? That is the question!

Unfortunately, I grew up not knowing either of my grandfathers, they were both gone prior to my birth. I've seen a couple of pictures and heard bits and pieces of stories here and there, but I wish I was able to know more about them. Still, I savor the bits and pieces of stories, even though they are not enough.

It was the opposite with my grandmothers. Although they are both gone now too, I was blessed with their presence, charm and wisdom. They took me places, told me stories, and fed me well. And, they gave me money too. After repeatedly telling me they didn't have any,  all of a sudden, money would magically appear, thanks to my perfect puppy face. You gotta know how to work a grandma!:-)

Fast forward 75-100 years. With our social-media footprints, our grandchildren will have no
problems finding out about us, if at all they are unfortunate enough not to know us in person. All they have to do is get into the Facebook archives, and look at the BIG picture we painted for them as a gift.

If Grandma/Grandpa was a pothead, they will see all the marijuana related postings and article shares there. If Grandma/Grandpa was a wannabe super model, they will see all the pose-up photos there. If Grandma/Grandpa was a show off, they will see all the narcissistic/arrogant posts there. If Grandma/Grandpa was a ranter or drama queen/king, they will see all the drama and necessary/unnecessary ranting sessions there. If Grandma/Grandpa had a generous and kind spirit, they will see all the caring posts there. If Grandma/Grandpa was a big flirt, they will see all the kisses and the winks there. (Btw, they should not break into the "inbox" deh, an avalanche of flirty messages will bury them). If Grandma/Grandpa was into gossip, they will see all the the gossipy posts there. And if Grandma/Grandpa was a mix bag of nuts, then they will have to figure things out and try to establish a pattern. So, paint your BIG picture and don't be shy. Am sure your grandchildren will still be proud of you, regardless. 

Monday, August 25, 2014

Welcome To Gamrock!


Welcome to Gamrock! Oh Gambia why Gambia?

A federal penitentiary with open skies and tighter than Alcatraz
Masses isolated in solitary confinement compelled to worship Babili
Escape a luxury only a few can afford
Corpse floating in the Atlantic Ocean from failed attempts

Welcome to Gamrock! Oh Gambia why Gambia?

20 years of guessing and being in the dark
Blind visions differentiated only by number 2020, 2016, 2015
A recycling center where officials get dumped as toxic waste after use
But still many faithfully answer to the calling of Babili

Welcome to Gamrock! Oh Gambia why Gambia?

Institutions hijacked and religion kidnapped
Oh God must I watch, hear and feel relentless scraping
Metal against flesh a country’s uterus screaming
Contracting wildly in confusion and excruciating pain

Welcome to Gamrock! Oh Gambia why Gambia?

Blood racing into the river causing it to overflow
Fish migrate seeking a new and safe habitat
The Mile 2 vampire constantly thirsty for fresh blood
Beating mosquitoes to every drop leaving them to starve

Welcome to Gamrock! Oh Gambia why Gambia?

Economic progress a deadbeat dad and always absent
Unemployment a single mother and always present
Too many kids to feed in a dry land
Wonder if water will ever come out of the rock

Welcome to Gamrock! Oh Gambia why Gambia?

Adults sitting with their tongues deep inside their pockets
Who will unfold the children’s consciousness?
The going is tough and the tough is at a standstill
Is God willing, unwilling, present or absent?

Welcome to Gamrock! Oh Gambia why Gambia?

Night turns to day but darkness persistently lingers
The noise keeps growing in a nation’s head reaching a crescendo
And now out of commonwealth and into uncommon-poverty
Dancing with North Korea, I wonder who will aid whom?

Welcome to Gamrock!

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Watch The Mic!

(Photo courtesy of Libertynews.com)
Watch the mic! It is hot sensitive and intoxicating

Covered by cumulonimbus clouds the airwaves hang low
Ten feet from the ground and twenty thousand feet high
So dark so heavy and so full of moisture
Voices pouring down like monsoon rain with clapping thunder

Watch the mic! It is hot sensitive and intoxicating.

Thunder loud enough to cause permanent hearing loss
Full of misinformation false accusations and blah blah blah
Houses flooded parents and other family members get washed away
Down the river Gambia they go leaving dirty laundry behind

Watch the mic! It is hot sensitive and intoxicating.

Tons of rubble littering the ground after the stormy voices
Now who’s going to clean up this mess?
Used as a weapon to destroy and not as a tool to construct
Tagging and attempting to assassinate those who object

Watch the mic! It is hot sensitive and intoxicating.

Baanenderoo ak saga ndey nicely packaged and ready to go
Free delivery to your doorstep rain or shine
Don’t you dare question conflict of interests or speak your mind
You will be rewarded with name-calling and a spoiler of the year award

Watch the mic! It is hot sensitive and intoxicating.

Personal interest false claims and self-positioning front and center
All geared towards something nonexistent
Common good principle and integrity on the back burner
While super kanja is cooked and served daily

Watch the mic! It is hot sensitive and intoxicating.

Attitude adjustment and sensitivity training badly needed
Egos tamed and returned into their holes
Issues and ideas must replace personal attacks and lies
Rebuilding and enlightenment must be the focus

Let’s use the radio and not abuse it!

Monday, June 2, 2014

The Concept of Power

Do you think about the concept of power? I have been, a lot lately. And my unfettered curiosity would not let me rest, so I felt compelled to explore the subject. However, as soon as I started to get my feet wet on the matter, I quickly realized that it is densely intricate and deeply subjective. At a minimum, it would take me a lifetime to try to unravel the concept of power, and I only have half left, if am lucky, which I am not willing to dedicate to the subject in the first place. And, I have other interests too, so I decided to settle for what was possible, considering my hazardously busy life and benign laziness. 

In expressing my curiosity in the subject of power, I don’t want to give the impression, even remotely, that I am an expert or have done extensive reading on the subject. In fact, I have a series of questions of my own. Does power and authority mean the same thing? If not, can one exist without the other? Are they interchangeable? If not, where does authority end and power begin? Is the relationship between a parent and a child, power based or authority based? I guess that depends on the “cultural context”, because you would have to have some form of absolute power over your child to be able to force them into marriage. What about influence? Is it a form of power too? I hope someone else will feast on these questions and clarify them for me. But for the purpose of this piece, I intend to focus on the three instruments for wielding or enforcing power:

Power is one of those few words we use frequently with seemingly little need to reflect on its meaning, and so it has been for all of history. In addition to kingship and glory, power is associated with God in all the Holy Books – as having the ultimate power. Power is referenced in most of our daily conversations, and not many get through the day without mentioning it. The United States is said to have power and Britain is said to have lost power. Corporations are said to be dangerously powerful, and the multinational ones even more so. The United States used to have industrial power, but they lost that to Germany and Japan. How about China? Russia is showing some military power at the moment in Ukraine in their attempt to annex Crimea. India recently elected a new Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, and power is expected to shift there. Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are seen as powerful people. Jonnie Cochran was deemed a powerful lawyer. 

The internet is said to be powerful. We should not forget religious leaders. Oh, and a good number of presidents around the world have too much power which allows them to be dictators. What does all this mean? None of these and the countless other references to power is ever thought to need any explanation. Regardless of the context in which the word is used, we just assume the meaning is understood. The frequent use of power has given it such a commonsense meaning and it needs little or no clarification. Webster defines power as “the ability or right to control people or things”. Max Weber, the German sociologist and political scientist (1864 – 1920), who was deeply mesmerized by the intricacy of the subject, settled for a definition close to everyday understanding: power is “the ability to impose one’s will upon the behavior of other persons”. Someone or some group is always trying to impose their will on someone or a group daily, in every aspect of life and everywhere in the world. But exactly how is this will imposed? It is done through Condign, Compensatory and Conditioned power.

Condign power has a prehistoric and well-established relationship to physical punishment, detention under various harsh conditions, inflicting of pain, mutilation, other forms of torture, or even death. This idea is real; all societies recognize the unkind character of such condign punishment and its cruelty, and all have regulations controlling or trying to control its use. For the most part, it’s considered a form of human rights abuse now, and society in general condemns its promiscuous use by a country or a system of government. Entities like Humans Right Watch and Amnesty International were set up for this specific reason. Tiananmen Square, Abu Ghraib and Mile2 come to mind. 

The most distinctive quality of condign power is that it’s objective and visible. Condign power threatens the individual with physical or emotion pain harmful enough for them to forgo the pursuits of their own will or preference to avoid it. In other words, submission is won by making the alternative adequately painful. It is a form of quid pro quo for their submission. Those submitting to the will of others are doing so consciously; they have calculated that this is a better course of action for them. For example, inmates in Guantanamo Bay gave up information (true or false) to avoid waterboarding. For most societies, it is considered imperative that murder, rape and other physical assault be prevented, that condign power be used to bring the would-be murderer or rapist firmly into submission to the will of the community on these matters. 

These acts, accordingly, lie under a threat of heavy punishment (mostly condign) to curtail them. However, the proper degree in condign punishment is among the most disputed questions in modern society, and the source of intense debate. Does the punishment handed to a murderer or rapist appropriate to the result sought? How about those guilty of treason? What grade of condign punishment is fitting enough not to violate their liberty and dignity? Physical superiority gave men the ability to impose their will on their physically weaker spouse. Husbands originally won the submission or obedience of wives by applying or the threat of physical assault. A schoolmaster traditionally imposed his will by condign punishment; something I can attest to because my dad was once a schoolmaster (njeff rek!). I wonder if “spare the rod and spoil the child” still holds.

Compensatory power is similar to condign power in its distinctive objectivity and visibility quality, but submission is bought instead of won by the threat of inflicting physical punishment. A laborer who works for pay is at a much better place that the slave whose submission to the will of the master is persuaded by the threat of brutal physical punishment. The former gets no compensation and faces the threat of starvation if he refuses to work and the latter gets lashes but never gets fired. The slave has a better job security by far. The difference between slave labor and paid labor is indeed great, but should the change be attributed to economic development or enlightenment. 

Compensatory power is the relationship between employer and employee. Employees are rewarded for their submission in the form of a paycheck by employers, and the threat of getting fired and starvation is sufficient for them to submit to their employer’s will. Part of the submission also includes proper and acceptable behavior based on the employer’s guidelines. But employees will not willingly submit to overtime work without overtime pay, thanks to the labor laws we have in place in most societies now. The appropriate gradation of compensatory reward is also among the disputed questions in modern society, and source of strong contention, especially, between the sexes. Why do women get paid less than men for performing the same job? Are the salaries paid to CEOs too excessive? 

In addition to the threat of physical assault against women for their submission, no one can doubt the effectiveness of compensatory power, of reward in the form of clothing, jewelry, trips and entertainment. These have long and sufficiently helped men in securing the feminine will. Yep! Ladies, did you hear that? All the gifts, trips and entertainments are intended to buy your submission. What about soldiers whose submissions are won partially by their pay, partially by the threat of condign punishment if they fail to show bravery in the presence of the enemy. In earlier times soldiers who deserted in the face of the enemy were subject to summary execution. Mercenaries on the other hand, are motivated only by compensatory power. People with money are said to have power because they can pay others to summit to their will. Compensatory is considered a more socially desirable way of obtaining submission compared to Condign.

Although Condign and Compensatory power are visible and objective, Condition power, on the other hand, is subjective; neither those exercising it nor those subject to it need to realize that it is being applied. Submission is gained through persuasion and education. This is explicit conditioning. It can be dictated by the culture itself or religion; the submission is considered to be standard, appropriate, or traditionally proper. This is implicit conditioning. With no clear line separating the two; explicit conditioning blends into implicit. Physical strength gave men access to condign power over women and compensatory power helps in securing feminine obedience with masculine will. However, most of male power and female submission is a result of conditioned power.  

Female submission to masculine will has virtually relied on belief since ancient times – that such submission is the natural order of things. It is inked in scripture and reinforced at home, and in the schools as the proper role of women in society. Men should love, honor and cherish, and women are to love, honor and obey. Women are prepared from when they are young to be delivered to men down the aisle, and FGM (female genital mutilation) is part of that preparation in some cultures. Despite the physical, psychological and emotional trauma, this cruel practice is performed on more than 125 million girls and women in the 29 countries in Africa and Middle East where FGM is concentrated. The practice is mostly believed to preserve chastity, ensuring desirability, improving fertility, and enhancing sexual pleasure for men. Go figure! 

Nonetheless, all throughout history, you will find an occasionally astonishing or eccentric woman who, by personality or sexual competence, will manage to impose her will on men, community or government. Marilyn Monroe was such a woman (Happy Birthday Mr. President!). Let’s not forget Cleopatra who, as pharaoh, consummated a liaison with Julius Caesar that solidified her grip on the throne. As with the assertion of male dominance, the power of belief is paramount in other aspects of conditioned power. The old chestnut of Gambia’s president possessing the ability to cure AIDS is part of conditioned power meant to mystify him. The power of religion is overwhelmingly driven by belief – belief that it is divine, and supported by the threat of condign punishment both in the present and the hereafter. Conditioned power is the product of a range from objective, persuasion and education.

Condign, compensatory and conditioned power, to an unfortunate extent is abundantly available to presidents in much of the present-day world to help them stay in power. They have the ability to use condign power to confine, torture and kill those who oppose their will. Their access to state funds allows them to use compensatory power to buy the support and will of the people. And conditioned power, to a large degree, helps create belief – belief that leaders know what’s best for the people and should never be questioned. In an effort to emancipate women from male domination, various forms of condign masculine power has been challenged, like the right of husbands to inflict physical and mental punishment on their spouses to subdue them, by the women’s movement. There has been a major push to mitigate the compensatory power imposed by men through education and the development of employment opportunities for women outside the home, and to end the discriminatory practices that keep women in subordinate jobs to get them out of Mitt Romney’s binder. But how much is being done to counter conditioned power, I wonder? The belief of female submission is still being reiterated as traditional values in the home, family, community and religion. And in most cases, women are full participants.

Thursday, April 10, 2014

April Nightmare

((http://www.worldsocialism.org)
Like April showers bullets rained down
Leaving students soaked in profuse blood

The new God came down like a ton of bricks
Students crushed and 14 lives expired?

Screams poignant enough to puncture eardrums
Helter Skelter and ringing heads

Heads inundated with noise filling the valleys of the mind
Gusting through the brain and bloodstream

Dust clouds form as students run to safe lives
Theirs’ and that of others

Defenseless but brave
State Securities operating with impunity

Green souls evaporated with unfulfilled promises left behind
Legacy so thick and suffocating

A dark story that exudes a stale chilliness
Now ingrained in the minds of mothers and country

Perished lives will rest in peace
While survivors struggle and show courage

Unpaid medical bills and hospital evictions
From London to Egypt as the games continue

Newspapers ignore relevant dates and incidents
Empty spaces given to meaningless other news

A cocktail of denial and arrogance served daily
When will the April Nightmare end?

Saturday, March 15, 2014

The Thione Seck Brouhaha – Opinion

From infancy onward, our ability to successfully regulate our emotions is a tremendously important skill that is not only crucial to archiving our personal objectives, but will also affect our character, which will in turn determine how we socially interact with others.

Between the ages of 5-12, we start to form moral values, recognize cultural and individual differences. And by our teenage years, our moral compass would have been fully formed, regardless of our cultural background.

Emotional competence and a decent moral compass are central to setting principles to live by in life. Emotional competence is necessary to help adjust our emotional arousal to an appropriate level to make better decisions, and moral compass helps guide those decisions. It is my opinion that there is a minimum set of emotional competence and adequate moral compass needed to be able to recognize the common good, but am afraid too many of us may be operating below that threshold. Without the minimum requirements, taking a stand on anything in life will be virtually impossible.

We are now consumed by self-interest, a culture of meaningless competitions, and enormous greed. If you are of the belief that tyranny is wrong and bad for humanity, you should vehemently reject it and anything that directly promotes it in all its forms. There are some things we should accept, and some things we should not accept.

This brings me to the ongoing brouhaha over the call to boycott Thione Seck’s upcoming tour in the U.S, to send a strong message to him and all the other President Jammeh praise singers. Anyone that claims to be against tyranny should not be involved in such, or try to justify it. Those invoking the names of other Jammeh praise singers in their attempt to rationalize the up-coming Thione Seck events are basically talking from both sides of their mouths. Two wrongs don’t make a right. We are good at finding ways to justify what benefits us, even when it does not align with what we claim to stand for or represent.

When concerned Gambians expressed their objections to Senegalese musicians endorsing and condoning dictatorship in The Gambia and asked that they refrain from doing so, it was only Thione Seck who responded in the media, and angrily too. Here is his response; “nobody can prevent me from doing my work. I will sing praises for anyone I like, including President Jammeh.” These were the words of a man supposedly endowed with wisdom, if we are to go by some of his songs (ndaanan nu ndaanan yee). Arrogant and disrespectful, to say the least!

Music is a powerful art form and comes with heavy responsibilities; that is why it is a special talent and not everyone has it. Music and musician have a way of influencing people’s psyche, and that should not be taken for granted. Beyoncé and Jay-Lo performed private concerts for dictators and were compelled to donate their pay to charity because they came under fire, and those were private concerts. This is a public concert and those who have issues with some of these artists and their unscrupulous ways should be able to voice their legitimate concerns.

What do we believe in as a people? Do we empathize with the plight of the Gambian people and are willing to make a minimal sacrifice? We keep chasing the intangibles at the expense of the suffering, and conflicting ourselves along the way. It is impossible to dialogue/negotiate with a double agent. And who does that anyway? Standing for something will not kill you, it will only help build your character and show that you value and recognize the common good.

We have been blinded by meaningless entertainment to the detriment of our people. It has become fashionable and a bragging right to be the number fan of one of these Senegalese praise singers. We spend more money on entertainment/”heews” than educating our children. You ask for a simple sacrifice of not attending a Thione Seck event to take a stand, and folks are ready to riot! Don’t get me wrong, I will dance to a tune myself, but will effortlessly take a rain check for the common good as well. There will be more tunes to dance to.

If you give your paycheck, tax returns funds, or your jewelry to a praise singer to sing your praises, you are basically buying yourself a “lie”. No, you don’t own Atlanta (yai borom Atlanta). No, you don’t own London (yai borom London). No, your Grandpa never owned half of any town in Gambia. But if that’s what makes you feel better, then go for it, have fun, and dance your troubles away.

Gambians in the diaspora have a choice to make and the opportunity to stand for something and make a difference no matter how minimal, unlike most back home. Hopefully, with proper usage of our emotional competencies and moral compasses, enough will decide to make the right choice!

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Memories of a Gambian Child

Heavy rain beating on the rooftop to the rhythm of drums
Children crawl into a fetal position under the covers

Back into Mummy’s tummy they return, safe and sound
Sleeping tight and dreaming pleasantly as the thunder roar

Outside seeds germinate and flowers freely grow and spread wild
Butterflies evolve…egg, caterpillar, cocoon, imago…ready to pollinate

The sun’s rays accentuate the beauty of their mesmerizing colors
They fly from flower to flower-gathering nectar, colors change before your eyes

Waves hitting the shoreline, shaping and designing the coastline
An architect employed by nature with infinite talent

Fishermen set sail in the middle of the night guided only by the moon
Women anxiously waiting on the beaches as fishermen return with the sun

Feather soft and milk white sand massage the soles of their feet
Relieving the load as they set to journey home and feed families

Palm trees in line waiting for marching orders
In colorful postcards they end up traveling the world over

Entering at Fatoto the river tirelessly runs to empty into the Atlantic
Washing away boats carrying cargo to destinations along the way

Majestic birds singing melodious songs of freedom on treetops
Too majestic for Queen Elizabeth to compete, tiara, broche, gloves and all

Bird watchers mesmerized by their vibrant colors and glorious sounds
With the naked eye, ears, and binoculars they come equipped and ready

Unlucky Pigeons answer to the holy calling of my slingshot
Not too filling but tasty enough and worth the trouble

Playing outside a profession I cherished and perfected
Meet me at the park for a soccer challenge win or lose

The aroma of Grandma’s Churaa gerrteh a feast for my sense of smell
As I turn the corner for the final stretch to retire for the evening

Oh how I miss the stories I never understood as a curious child
They molded me into shape, gave me eternal memories, and guided me

Press rewind, I want to watch my childhood over and over again
Please don’t destroy the reel; classic movies are always the best!

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

The Land I used to know

The land I used to know was sandy, warm and sunny
Tiny, cute, fluffy and cuddly like a bunny

The laughter of children abundant and endless 
And smiles rivaled the sun for brightness

All that now replaced by sorrow and sadness
Situation altered to nothing but madness

Like a sailing ship I’ve watched it drift away
My soul detached not wanting to stay

Children crush each other scrambling for biscuits thrown at them
Wearing rags with too many holes to hem

Dreams I envisioned for them fade away into the sky
Like clouds making way for sunshine after the storm, but why?

What have they done to deserve this?
Has God abandoned them because he’s pissed?

Their sweet dreams turning into a violent nightmare
Leaving every bed wet with sweat and urine, I swear

A bedtime story and the sweetest lullaby no longer comforting
And nets no longer reliable to stop mosquitoes from penetrating

The land I use to know is now a stranger to me
And what did Mummy say they could be?

Even the sky has become crushingly oppressive
Hanging low enough to generate pressure so excessive

My people’s actions have left me dizzy and confused
But their new value system I vehemently refused

Calling me bro but will have the lions eat me like a Christmas pie
Why should I let a vicious eagle unplug my eye?

The land I used to know is now like an alien from space
And I wonder who will discover her when she lands in a field of mace.